33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives with the police will be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, ensure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the realized counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this element for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically deemed within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
Because the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically bring on exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. When a writ under Article 199 is available in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-examine witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons acquiring their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to do away with the candidature from the petitioner. Read more
Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue direction with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of the police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make sure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The more info law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair on the offender and also the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
Doing a case law search may be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case regulation searches, together with:
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common legislation traditions create differences in how that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the wider legal principles.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is nicely founded now that the provision for proforma promotion will not be alien or unfamiliar on the civil servant service construction but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it truly is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if glad that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province within the higher post, direct that this kind of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay back and allowances of these types of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, It's also a properly-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.